Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions
- 9 November 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Vol. 9 (12), 921-929
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3275
Abstract
Sustained advocacy efforts driven by patients' organizations to make rare diseases a health priority have led to regulatory and economic incentives for industry to develop drugs for these diseases, known as orphan drugs. These incentives, enacted in regulations first introduced in the United States in 1983 and later in Japan, Europe and elsewhere, have resulted in substantial improvements in the treatment for patients with a range of rare diseases. However, the advent of orphan drug development has also triggered several questions, from the definition of rarity to the pricing of orphan drugs and their impact on health-care systems. This article provides an industry perspective on some of the common questions and misconceptions related to orphan drug development and its regulation, with the aim of facilitating future progress in the field.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The US Orphan Drug Act: Rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?Health Policy, 2010
- Relative efficacy of drugs: an emerging issue between regulatory agencies and third-party payersNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2010
- How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challengeNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2010
- Orphan drug development is not taking offBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2009
- Adopting Orphan Drugs — Two Dozen Years of Treating Rare DiseasesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Orphan drug policies: implications for the United States, Canada, and developing countries.2004