The relationship between the number of mastitis pathogens placed on the teats of dry cows, their survival, and the amount of intramammary infection caused
- 1 February 1962
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Dairy Research
- Vol. 29 (1), 79-93
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022029900010992
Abstract
Summary: When the teats of dry cows were dipped in a culture containing 3–25 × 106 mastitis organisms/ml only 25% of 71 quarters acquired an intramammary infection. Small numbers of organisms applied to teats caused negligible infection. The degree of contamination also determined the survival of the organisms on the exterior of teats, which was much greater at the teat apex than on the body of the teat.There was no evidence that swabbing the teat apex increased the chance of intramammary infection. Washing the udder of infected cows with a disinfectant increased the chance of recovering the organisms from the teat skin.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unusual varieties of Staphylococcus aureusThe Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1961
- 627. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’: V. The effect of teat disinfection at drying-off on the incidence of infections in the early dry periodJournal of Dairy Research, 1956
- 626. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’: IV. The relationship between the new infection rate in the early dry period and the daily milk yield at drying-off when lactation was ended by either intermittent or abrupt cessation of milkingJournal of Dairy Research, 1956
- 625. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’: III. The method of drying-off cows at the end of lactationJournal of Dairy Research, 1956
- 624. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’: II. The effect of withdrawing secretion from the dry udder on the incidence of infectionJournal of Dairy Research, 1956
- 532. The relationship between mastitis and the method of stripping after machine milkingJournal of Dairy Research, 1954
- 408. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’. IJournal of Dairy Research, 1950