Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 25 (6), 765-771
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp053
Abstract
Motivation: Statistical methods are used to test for the differential expression of genes in microarray experiments. The most widely used methods successfully test whether the true differential expression is different from zero, but give no assurance that the differences found are large enough to be biologically meaningful. Results: We present a method, t-tests relative to a threshold (TREAT), that allows researchers to test formally the hypothesis (with associated p-values) that the differential expression in a microarray experiment is greater than a given (biologically meaningful) threshold. We have evaluated the method using simulated data, a dataset from a quality control experiment for microarrays and data from a biological experiment investigating histone deacetylase inhibitors. When the magnitude of differential expression is taken into account, TREAT improves upon the false discovery rate of existing methods and identifies more biologically relevant genes. Availability: R code implementing our methods is contributed to the software package limma available at http://www.bioconductor.org. Contact:smyth@wehi.edu.auKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transcriptome Analysis of the Normal Human Mammary Cell Commitment and Differentiation ProcessCell Stem Cell, 2008
- Functional and metabolic remodelling in GLUT4-deficient hearts confers hyper-responsiveness to substrate interventionJournal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 2008
- Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, with application to DNA Microarray DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2005
- Cross-platform comparability of microarray technology: Intra-platform consistency and appropriate data analysis procedures are essentialBMC Bioinformatics, 2005
- Significance testing for small microarray experimentsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- A case study on choosing normalization methods and test statistics for two‐channel microarray dataComparative and Functional Genomics, 2004
- Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray ExperimentsStatistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2004
- Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation responseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancerNature Genetics, 1996
- Parallel human genome analysis: microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996