The Myth of the Failed State and the War on Terror: A Challenge to the Conventional Wisdom
Top Cited Papers
- 26 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding
- Vol. 1 (3), 307-332
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970701592256
Abstract
A central hypothesis in the articulated rationale inspiring the war on terror suggests that failed states play a key role in the international terrorist nexus and require external intervention and guided democratization. This logic is based on two related premises; first that there is a direct link between failed states and international terrorism, second that democratic governance reduces the recourse to terrorism. This article suggests that there is no causal link between failed states and international terrorism and that the asserted ability of democratic governance to catalyze a reduction in terrorism is exaggerated if not wholly inaccurate.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR TheoryEuropean Journal of International Relations, 2005
- Terrorist Sanctuaries and Bosnia-Herzegovina: Challenging Conventional AssumptionsStudies in Conflict & Terrorism, 2005
- Rebuilding Weak StatesForeign Affairs, 2005
- Behind the Curve: Globalization and International TerrorismInternational Security, 2003
- Market Civilization and Its Clash with TerrorInternational Security, 2003
- The Roots of Terrorism: Probing the MythsThe Political Quarterly, 2002
- Terrorism and Democracy: Perpetrators and VictimsTerrorism and Political Violence, 2001
- Things Fall Apart: State Failure and the Politics of InterventionInternational Studies Review, 1999
- Towards a taxonomy of failed states in the New World Order: Decaying Somalia, Liberia, Rwanda and HaitiThird World Quarterly, 1996
- Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic PeaceInternational Security, 1994