Differential Clearance and Immune Responses to Tick Cell-Derived versus Macrophage Culture-DerivedEhrlichia chaffeensisin Mice
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Infection and Immunity
- Vol. 75 (1), 135-145
- https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.01127-06
Abstract
Human monocytic ehrlichiosis is caused by a tick-transmitted rickettsia, Ehrlichia chaffeensis. We recently reported that E. chaffeensis grown in tick cells expresses different proteins than bacteria grown in macrophages. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that immune responses against E. chaffeensis would be different if the mice are challenged with bacteria grown in macrophages or tick cells. We assessed the E. chaffeensis clearance from the peritoneum, spleen, and liver by C57BL/6J mice using a TaqMan-based real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay. Macrophage-grown E. chaffeensis was cleared in 2 weeks from the peritoneum, whereas the pathogen from tick cells persisted for nine additional days and included three relapses of increasing bacterial load separated by three-day intervals. Tick cell-grown bacteria also persisted in the livers and spleens with higher bacterial loads compared to macrophage-grown bacteria and fluctuated over a period of 35 days. Three-day periodic cycles were detected in T-cell CD62L/CD44 ratios in the spleen and bone marrow in response to infections with both tick cell- and macrophage-grown bacteria and were accompanied by similar periodic cycles of spleen cell cytokine secretions and nitric oxide and interleukin-6 by peritoneal macrophages. The E. chaffeensis-specific immunoglobulin G response was considerably higher and steadily increased in mice infected with the tick cell-derived E. chaffeensis compared to DH82-grown bacteria. In addition, antigens detected by the immunoglobulins were significantly different between mice infected with the E. chaffeensis originating from tick cells or macrophages. The differences in the immune response to tick cell-grown bacteria compared to macrophage-grown bacteria reflected a delay in the shift of gene expression from the tick cell-specific Omp 14 gene to the macrophage-specific Omp 19 gene. These data suggest that the host response to E. chaffeensis depends on the source of the bacteria and that this experimental model requires the most natural inoculum possible to allow for a realistic understanding of host resistance.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed Clearance of Ehrlichia chaffeensis Infection in CD4 + T-Cell Knockout Mice†Infection and Immunity, 2004
- Experimental Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection in beaglesJournal of Medical Microbiology, 2003
- PersistentEhrlichia chaffeensisInfection Occurs in the Absence of Functional Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II GenesInfection and Immunity, 2002
- Sensitive Detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis in Cell Culture, Blood, and Tick Specimens by Reverse Transcription-PCRJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- A new theory of cytotoxic T–lymphocyte memory: implications for HIV treatmentPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functionsNature, 1999
- Lipopolysaccharide is required for the lethal effects of enterotoxin B after D-galactosamine sensitizationInnate Immunity, 1995
- Cytotoxic T-cell memory without antigenNature, 1994
- Persistent Infection with Ehrlichia chaffeensisClinical Infectious Diseases, 1993
- Cyclic Thrombocytopenia Induced by a Rickettsia-Like Agent in DogsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1978