Indigenous well-being in four countries: An application of the UNDP'S Human Development Index to Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC International Health and Human Rights
- Vol. 7 (1), 9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698x-7-9
Abstract
Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand consistently place near the top of the United Nations Development Programme's Human Development Index (HDI) rankings, yet all have minority Indigenous populations with much poorer health and social conditions than non-Indigenous peoples. It is unclear just how the socioeconomic and health status of Indigenous peoples in these countries has changed in recent decades, and it remains generally unknown whether the overall conditions of Indigenous peoples are improving and whether the gaps between Indigenous peoples and other citizens have indeed narrowed. There is unsettling evidence that they may not have. It was the purpose of this study to determine how these gaps have narrowed or widened during the decade 1990 to 2000. Census data and life expectancy estimates from government sources were used to adapt the Human Development Index (HDI) to examine how the broad social, economic, and health status of Indigenous populations in these countries have changed since 1990. Three indices – life expectancy, educational attainment, and income – were combined into a single HDI measure. Between 1990 and 2000, the HDI scores of Indigenous peoples in North America and New Zealand improved at a faster rate than the general populations, closing the gap in human development. In Australia, the HDI scores of Indigenous peoples decreased while the general populations improved, widening the gap in human development. While these countries are considered to have high human development according to the UNDP, the Indigenous populations that reside within them have only medium levels of human development. The inconsistent progress in the health and well-being of Indigenous populations over time, and relative to non-Indigenous populations, points to the need for further efforts to improve the social, economic, and physical health of Indigenous peoples.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Excess Indigenous mortality: are Indigenous Australians more severely disadvantaged than other Indigenous populations?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Disappearing, displaced, and undervalued: a call to action for Indigenous health worldwideThe Lancet, 2006
- Patterns, trends, and increasing disparities in mortality for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal infants born in Western Australia, 1980–2001: population database studyThe Lancet, 2006
- Widening ethnic mortality disparities in New Zealand 1981–99Social Science & Medicine, 2005
- Indigenous disparities in disease-specific mortality, a cross-country comparison: New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the United States.2004
- Unlocking the numerator-denominator bias III: adjustment ratios by ethnicity for 1981-1999 mortality data. The New Zealand Census-Mortality Study.2003
- Indigenous suicide in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United StatesEmergency Medicine, 2002
- ABORIGINAL MORTALITY IN CANADA, THE UNITED STATES AND NEW ZEALANDJournal of Biosocial Science, 2001
- Comparing the Policy of Aboriginal Assimilation: Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1996
- The Fourth Stage of the Epidemiologic Transition: The Age of Delayed Degenerative DiseasesThe Milbank Quarterly, 1986