Relation of the Revised Repression-Sensitization Scale to Measures of Self-Description
- 1 October 1963
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 13 (2), 323-334
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1963.13.2.323
Abstract
An internal-consistency item-analysis was carried out for the 182-item Repression-Sensitization Scale. Responses to each question were correlated with Total R-S score for two samples consisting of 370 undergraduates each. A revised scoring key was made, consisting of 127 cross-validated items. Using a new sample, reliability coefficients of .94 (split-half) and .82 (test-retest) were found. In subsequent investigations, R-S scores were found to be positively related to self-ideal discrepancy and negative self-description on Worchel's SAI. On a measure of Hostility Incongruency, R-S scores were positively related to each of three types of incongruency. There were only minimal differences between the two scoring keys in the relationships found. The consistent finding that self-report measures are related to the R-S Scale was discussed and alternate hypotheses were advanced to account for these relationships.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response styles on the MMPI: Comparison of clinical and normal samples.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962
- An empirically derived MMPI scale which measures facilitation-inhibition of recognition of threatening stimuliJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1962
- The repression-sensitization scale: rationale, reliability, and validity1Journal of Personality, 1961
- Incongruency as a predictor of response to humor.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961
- Changes in self-ideal discrepancy in repressors and sensitizers.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960
- Anxiety as related to incongruences between values and feelingsThe Psychological Record, 1958
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonancePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1957
- The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1939