Injection Therapy for Subacute and Chronic Benign Low Back Pain
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 26 (5), 501-515
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200103010-00014
Abstract
The Medline and Embase databases containing randomized controlled trials of injection therapy published to 1998 were systematically reviewed. To evaluate the effectiveness of injection therapy with anesthetics, steroids, or both in patients with low back pain persisting longer than 1 month. Two reviewers independently assessed the trials for the quality of their methods. The primary outcome measure was pain relief. Subgroup analyses were performed between trials with different control groups (placebo and active injections), with different injection sites (facet-joint, epidural, and local injections), and with timing of outcome measurement (short- and long-term). Within the resulting 12 (2 × 3 × 2) subcategories of studies, the overall relative risks and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated, using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. In the case of trials using active injections as a control, the results were not pooled. This review included 21 randomized trials. All the studies involved patients with low back pain persisting longer than 1 month. Only 11 studies compared injection therapy with placebo injections (explanatory trials). The methodologic quality of many studies was low: Only eight studies had a methodologic score of 50 points or more. There were only three well-designed explanatory clinical trials: one on injections into the facet joints with a short-term relative risk of 0.89 (95% confidence interval = 0.65–1.21) and a long-term relative risk of 0.90 (95% confidence interval = 0.69–1.17), one on epidural injections with a short-term relative risk of of 0.94 (95% confidence interval = 0.76–1.15) and a long-term relative risk of 1.00 (95% confidence interval = 0.71–1.41), and one on local injections with a long-term relative risk of 0.79 (95% confidence interval = 0.65–0.96). Within the six subcategories of explanatory studies, the pooled relative risks were as follows: facet joint, short-term: relative risk = 0.89 (95% confidence interval = 0.65–1.21); facet joint, long-term: relative risk = 0.90 (95% confidence interval = 0.69–1.17); epidural, short-term: relative risk = 0.93 (95% confidence interval = 0.79–1.09); epidural, long-term: relative risk = 0.92 (95% confidence interval = 0.76–1.11); local, short-term: relative risk = 0.80 (95% confidence interval = 0.40–1.59); and local, long-term: relative risk = 0.79 (95% confidence interval = 0.65–0.96). Convincing evidence is lacking regarding the effects of injection therapy on low back pain. Additional well-designed explanatory trials in this field are needed.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chronic Cervical Zygapophysial Joint Pain After WhiplashSpine, 1996
- The Prevalence and Clinical Features of Internal Disc Disruption in Patients With Chronic Low Back PainSpine, 1995
- Chronic Unilateral Low-Back PainSpine, 1990
- Acupuncture and chronic pain: A criteria-based meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- Neck Pain: A Long-term Follow-up of 205 PatientsSpine, 1987
- Injection of Steroids and Local Anaesthetics as Therapy for Low-back PainScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1985
- The Conservative Treatment of SciaticaSpine, 1984
- Dry Needling of Muscle Motor Points for Chronic Low-Back PainSpine, 1980
- Double Blind Evaluation of Extradural Methyl Prednisolone for Herniated Lumbar DiscsActa Orthopaedica, 1977
- INTRASACRAL EPIDURAL INJECTION IN THE TREATMENT OF SCIATICA.The Lancet, 1930