Defining Human Embryo Phenotypes by Cohort-Specific Prognostic Factors
Open Access
- 2 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 3 (7), e2562
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002562
Abstract
Hundreds of thousands of human embryos are cultured yearly at in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers worldwide, yet the vast majority fail to develop in culture or following transfer to the uterus. However, human embryo phenotypes have not been formally defined, and current criteria for embryo transfer largely focus on characteristics of individual embryos. We hypothesized that embryo cohort-specific variables describing sibling embryos as a group may predict developmental competence as measured by IVF cycle outcomes and serve to define human embryo phenotypes. We retrieved data for all 1117 IVF cycles performed in 2005 at Stanford University Medical Center, and further analyzed clinical data from the 665 fresh IVF, non-donor cycles and their associated 4144 embryos. Thirty variables representing patient characteristics, clinical diagnoses, treatment protocol, and embryo parameters were analyzed in an unbiased manner by regression tree models, based on dichotomous pregnancy outcomes defined by positive serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG). IVF cycle outcomes were most accurately predicted at ∼70% by four non-redundant, embryo cohort-specific variables that, remarkably, were more informative than any measures of individual, transferred embryos: Total number of embryos, number of 8-cell embryos, rate (percentage) of cleavage arrest in the cohort and day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level. While three of these variables captured the effects of other significant variables, only the rate of cleavage arrest was independent of any known variables. Our findings support defining human embryo phenotypes by non-redundant, prognostic variables that are specific to sibling embryos in a cohort.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines on number of embryos transferredFertility and Sterility, 2006
- Benefit of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with a high incidence of triploidy in a prior in vitro fertilization cycleFertility and Sterility, 2006
- Predictors of embryo fragmentation and outcome after fragment removal in in vitro fertilizationFertility and Sterility, 2006
- Predicting in vitro fertilization live birth using stimulation day 6 estradiol, age, and follicle-stimulating hormoneFertility and Sterility, 2005
- Embryo fragmentation as a determinant of blastocyst development in vitro and pregnancy outcomes following embryo transferAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Number of good quality embryos on day 3 is predictive for both pregnancy and implantation rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cyclesFertility and Sterility, 2004
- Comparison of basal follicle-stimulating hormone versus the clomiphene citrate challenge test for ovarian reserve screeningFertility and Sterility, 2004
- Derivation of Embryonic Stem-Cell Lines from Human BlastocystsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Discarded EmbryosThe International Journal of Cell Cloning, 2003
- Accuracy of day three criteria for selecting the best embryos.Fertility and Sterility, 2001