Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows?
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Vol. 52 (478), 395-400
Abstract
Intuition is a decision-making method that is used unconsciously by experienced practitioners but is inaccessible to the novice. It is rapid, subtle, contextual, and does not follow simple, cause-and-effect logic. Evidence-based medicine offers exciting opportunities_for improving patient outcomes, but the 'evidence-burdened' approach of the inexperienced, protocol-driven clinician is well documented Intuition is not unscientific. It is a highly creative process, fundamental to hypothesis generation in science. The experienced practitioner should generate and follow clinical hunches as well as (not instead of applying the deductive principles of evidence-based medicine. The educational research literature suggests that we can improve our intuitive powers through systematic critical reflection about intuitive judgements--for example, through creative writing and dialogue with professional colleagues. It is time to revive and celebrate clinical storytelling as a method for professional education and development. The stage is surely set for a new, improved--and, indeed, evidence-based--'Balint'group.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Evidence Supports Teaching Evidence-based Medicine?Academic Medicine, 2000
- Bridging the gap.Patient Education and Counseling, 2000
- Medicine based evidence, a prerequisite for evidence basedBMJ, 1997
- The unacceptable face of evidence-based medicineJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1997
- "Is my practice evidence-based?"BMJ, 1996
- Evidence based general practice: a retrospective study of interventions in one training practiceBMJ, 1996
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- Evidence-based and Evidence-biased MedicineAge and Ageing, 1995
- CLINICAL PRACTICE IS NOT APPLIED SCIENTIFIC METHODAnz Journal of Surgery, 1995
- What Physicians KnowNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993