Ant Species Differences Determined by Epistasis between Brood and Worker Genomes
Open Access
- 3 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 2 (10), e994
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000994
Abstract
Epistasis arising from physiological interactions between gene products often contributes to species differences, particularly those involved in reproductive isolation. In social organisms, phenotypes are influenced by the genotypes of multiple interacting individuals. In theory, social interactions can give rise to an additional type of epistasis between the genomes of social partners that can contribute to species differences. Using a full-factorial cross-fostering design with three species of closely related Temnothorax ants, I found that adult worker size was determined by an interaction between the genotypes of developing brood and care-giving workers, i.e. intergenomic epistasis. Such intergenomic social epistasis provides a strong signature of coevolution between social partners. These results demonstrate that just as physiologically interacting genes coevolve, diverge, and contribute to species differences, so do socially interacting genes. Coevolution and conflict between social partners, especially relatives such as parents and offspring, has long been recognized as having widespread evolutionary effects. This coevolutionary process may often result in coevolved socially-interacting gene complexes that contribute to species differences.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multilevel Selection 1: Quantitative Genetics of Inheritance and Response to SelectionGenetics, 2007
- The Coadaptation of Parental Supply and Offspring DemandThe American Naturalist, 2005
- Multilevel selection: the evolution of cooperation in non‐kin groupsPopulation Ecology, 2005
- Contribution of maternal effect QTL to genetic architecture of early growth in miceHeredity, 2002
- Interacting Phenotypes and the Evolutionary Process. II. Selection Resulting from Social InteractionsThe American Naturalist, 1999
- Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell US About Group Selection in Nature?The American Naturalist, 1997
- Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and SpeciationThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1983
- The social regulation of physical caste: the superorganism revivedJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IIJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964