Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: Is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard?
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 178 (4), 658-669
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70475-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent or Treat Impaired Fetal GrowthObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1997
- Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnanciesPublished by Wiley ,1996
- Receiver-operator characteristic curves for the ultrasonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in low-risk pregnanciesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Do growth-retarded premature infants have different rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality than appropriately grown premature infants?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- A united states national reference for fetal growthObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, May 1991 through December 1992American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- The influence on a ‘normal’ birthweight distribution of a minor population of growth retarded infants: a Monte Carlo simulationEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1995
- Update of Growth Percentiles for Infants Born in an Australian PopulationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- The myth of fetal growth retardation at termBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Intrauterine growth retardation: Standards for diagnosisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989