The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 August 2008
- journal article
- special contribution
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Vol. 35 (12), 2320-2333
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0874-2
Abstract
Introduction Several studies have shown the usefulness of positron emission tomography (PET) quantification using standardised uptake values (SUV) for diagnosis and staging, prognosis and response monitoring. Many factors affect SUV, such as patient preparation procedures, scan acquisition, image reconstruction and data analysis settings, and the variability in methodology across centres prohibits exchange of SUV data. Therefore, standardisation of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET whole body procedures is required in multi-centre trials. Methods A protocol for standardisation of quantitative FDG whole body PET studies in the Netherlands (NL) was defined. This protocol is based on standardisation of: (1) patient preparation; (2) matching of scan statistics by prescribing dosage as function of patient weight, scan time per bed position, percentage of bed overlap and image acquisition mode (2D or 3D); (3) matching of image resolution by prescribing reconstruction settings for each type of scanner; (4) matching of data analysis procedure by defining volume of interest methods and SUV calculations and; (5) finally, a multi-centre QC procedure is defined using a 20-cm diameter phantom for verification of scanner calibration and the NEMA NU 2 2001 Image Quality phantom for verification of activity concentration recoveries (i.e., verification of image resolution and reconstruction convergence). Discussion This paper describes a protocol for standardization of quantitative FDG whole body multi-centre PET studies. Conclusion The protocol was successfully implemented in the Netherlands and has been approved by the Netherlands Society of Nuclear Medicine.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in OncologyJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2008
- FDG PET in lymphoma: The need for standardization of interpretation. An observer variation studyNuclear Medicine Communications, 2007
- Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parametersEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2006
- Traditional Versus Up-Front [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Dutch Cooperative Randomized StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- O-145 Prognostic significance of the 18FDG-PET standardized uptake value for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients after high-dose radiotherapyLung Cancer, 2005
- Clinical Experience with a Commercially Available Negative Oral Contrast Medium in PET/CTRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2005
- The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas; a systematic review and meta-analysisCancer Treatment Reviews, 2004
- New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PETIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2000
- Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendationsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1999