The Copenhagen Accord for limiting global warming: Criteria, constraints, and available avenues
- 19 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 107 (18), 8055-8062
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002293107
Abstract
At last, all the major emitters of greenhouse gases (GHGs) have agreed under the Copenhagen Accord that global average temperature increase should be kept below 2 degrees C. This study develops the criteria for limiting the warming below 2 degrees C, identifies the constraints imposed on policy makers, and explores available mitigation avenues. One important criterion is that the radiant energy added by human activities should not exceed 2.5 (range: 1.7-4) watts per square meter (Wm(-2)) of the Earth's surface. The blanket of man-made GHGs has already added 3 (range: 2.6-3.5) Wm(-2). Even if GHG emissions peak in 2015, the radiant energy barrier will be exceeded by 100%, requiring simultaneous pursuit of three avenues: (i) reduce the rate of thickening of the blanket by stabilizing CO(2) concentration below 441 ppm during this century (a massive decarbonization of the energy sector is necessary to accomplish this Herculean task), (ii) ensure that air pollution laws that reduce the masking effect of cooling aerosols be made radiant energy-neutral by reductions in black carbon and ozone, and (iii) thin the blanket by reducing emissions of short-lived GHGs. Methane and hydrofluorocarbons emerge as the prime targets. These actions, even if we are restricted to available technologies for avenues ii and iii, can reduce the probability of exceeding the 2 degrees C barrier before 2050 to less than 10%, and before 2100 to less than 50%. With such actions, the four decades we have until 2050 should be exploited to develop and scale-up revolutionary technologies to restrict the warming to less than 1.5 degrees C.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal Protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO 2 emissionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- In-situ measurements of the mixing state and optical properties of soot with implications for radiative forcing estimatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate systemProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Global warming: Stop worrying, start panicking?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: Formidable challenges aheadProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting climateProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Geoengineering: Encouraging Research and Overseeing ImplementationClimatic Change, 2006
- An emissions‐based view of climate forcing by methane and tropospheric ozoneGeophysical Research Letters, 2005
- Rapid disintegration of Alpine glaciers observed with satellite dataGeophysical Research Letters, 2004