Effects of Affirmative Action in Medical Schools

Abstract

In the early 1970s, affirmative-action programs were introduced to accomplish a number of social goals, including increasing the supply of minority physicians and improving the health care of the poor. To assess the success of such programs, we analyzed data on people who graduated from U.S. medical schools in 1975 to determine how specialty choice, practice locations, patient populations served, and board-certification rates differ between minority and nonminority graduates. A larger proportion of minority graduates (55 per cent vs. 41 per cent, P<0.001) chose the primary-care specialties of family practice, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, and obstetrics—gynecology. Significantly more minority physicians (12 per cent vs. 6 per cent, P<0.01) practiced in locations designated as health-manpower shortage areas by the federal government and had more Medicaid recipients in their patient populations (31 per cent for blacks, 24 per cent for Hispanics, 14 per cent for whites; P<0.001). Physicians from each racial or ethnic group served disproportionately more patients of their own racial or ethnic group (P<0.001), but minority physicians did not serve significantly more persons from other racial or ethnic minority groups than did nonminority physicians. Many minority physicians served patient populations much like those of their nonminority colleagues, which indicates that substantial integration of the medical marketplace has taken place. Significantly fewer minority graduates had become board-certified by 1984 (48 per cent vs. 80 per cent, P<0.001), and most of this disparity was associated with differences in premedical-school characteristics and in the patient populations they served. Our analysis shows that minority graduates of the medical school class of 1975 are fulfilling many of the objectives of affirmative-action programs. (N Engl J Med 1985; 313:1519–25.)