The intimacy triple bind: Structural inequalities and relational labour in the influencer industry
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 August 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in European Journal of Cultural Studies
- Vol. 27 (3), 424-440
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231194156
Abstract
The careers of social media content creators, or influencers, live or die by their ability to cultivate and maintain an invested audience-community. To this end, they are encouraged to practise what has been framed as ‘emotional labour’ (Hochschild, 2002 [1983]) and ‘relational labour’ (Baym, 2018), commodifying their personalities, lives and tastes in order to build ‘authentic’ self-brands and intimacy with audiences. Drawing on an ethnographic study of the London influencer industry (2017–2023), this article examines emotional/relational labour through an intersectional feminist lens, foregrounding the ways in which structural inequalities shape relationships between creators and their audiences. The tolls of managing audience relationships are higher for marginalised creators – especially those making stigmatised and less brandable content genres – who find themselves on an uneven playing field in the challenges they face as well as the coping strategies at their disposal. These creators are in an intimacy triple bind, already at higher risk of trolling and harassment, yet under increased pressure to perform relational labour, adversely opening them up to further harms in the form of weaponised intimacy. This article explores four key tactics that creators employ in response to such conditions, as they navigate relational labour and boundaries with audiences: (1) leaning into making rather than being content; (2) (dis)engaging with anti-fans through silence; (3) retreating into private community spaces, away from the exposure of public platforms; and, in parallel, (4) turning off public comments. The adverse experiences of marginalised creators who speak about their identities and experiences online raise serious concerns about the viability of content creation as a career for these groups, as well as the lack of accountability and responsibility that platforms show towards the creators who generate profit for them.Keywords
Funding Information
- Economic and Social Research Council (Doctoral Training Partnership Studentship)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Being ‘really real’ on YouTube: authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainmentMedia International Australia, 2017
- Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTubeInformation, Communication & Society, 2017
- #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technoculturesNew Media & Society, 2016
- #MasculinitySoFragile: culture, structure, and networked misogynyFeminist Media Studies, 2015
- You May Know Me from YouTube: (Micro‐)Celebrity in Social MediaPublished by Wiley ,2015
- Intersectionality's Definitional DilemmasAnnual Review of Sociology, 2015
- The romance of work: Gender and aspirational labour in the digital culture industriesInternational Journal of Cultural Studies, 2015
- In the Social Factory?Theory, Culture & Society, 2008
- Creative Work and Emotional Labour in the Television IndustryTheory, Culture & Society, 2008
- Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expressionNew Media & Society, 2008