Is "Junk" DNA Mostly Intron DNA?
Open Access
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genome Research
- Vol. 10 (11), 1672-1678
- https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.148900
Abstract
Among higher eukaryotes, very little of the genome codes for protein. What is in the rest of the genome, or the “junk” DNA, that, in Homo sapiens, is estimated to be almost 97% of the genome? Is it possible that much of this “junk” is intron DNA? This is not a question that can be answered just by looking at the published data, even from the finished genomes. One cannot assume that there are no genes in a sequenced region, just because no genes were annotated. We introduce another approach to this problem, based on an analysis of the cDNA-to-genomic alignments, in all of the complete or nearly-complete genomes from the multicellular organisms. Our conclusion is that, in animals but not in plants, most of the “junk” is intron DNA.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Genome Sequence of Drosophila melanogasterScience, 2000
- Genome Sequence of the Nematode C. elegans : A Platform for Investigating BiologyScience, 1998
- The origin of interspersed repeats in the human genomeCurrent Opinion in Genetics & Development, 1996
- Nested Retrotransposons in the Intergenic Regions of the Maize GenomeScience, 1996
- Generation and analysis of 280,000 human expressed sequence tags.Genome Research, 1996
- Evaluation of Gene Structure Prediction ProgramsGenomics, 1996
- Small is beautiful: comparative genomics with the pufferfish (Fugu rubripes)Trends in Genetics, 1996
- How many genes in the human genome?Nature Genetics, 1994
- Number of CpG islands and genes in human and mouse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993
- The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a geneGene, 1990