Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 55 (8), 783-786
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00440-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Secular changes in the quality of published randomized clinical trials in rheumatologyArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-AnalysesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature?Archives of Dermatology, 2000
- Mind and body therapy for fibromyalgiaPublished by Wiley ,1999
- The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysisJAMA, 1999
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Subverting randomization in controlled trialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986