Live Lecture Versus Video-Recorded Lecture: Are Students Voting With Their Feet?
- 1 December 2008
- journal article
- technology and-medical-education
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 83 (12), 1174-1178
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31818c6902
Abstract
Purpose In light of educators’ concerns that lecture attendance in medical school has declined, the authors sought to assess students’ perceptions, evaluations, and motivations concerning live lectures compared with accelerated, video-recorded lectures viewed online. Method The authors performed a cross-sectional survey study of all first- and second-year students at Harvard Medical School. Respondents answered questions regarding their lecture attendance; use of class and personal time; use of accelerated, video-recorded lectures; and reasons for viewing video-recorded and live lectures. Other questions asked students to compare how well live and video-recorded lectures satisfied learning goals. Results Of the 353 students who received questionnaires, 204 (58%) returned responses. Collectively, students indicated watching 57.2% of lectures live, 29.4% recorded, and 3.8% using both methods. All students have watched recorded lectures, and most (88.5%) have used video-accelerating technologies. When using accelerated, video-recorded lecture as opposed to attending lecture, students felt they were more likely to increase their speed of knowledge acquisition (79.3% of students), look up additional information (67.7%), stay focused (64.8%), and learn more (63.7%). Conclusions Live attendance remains the predominant method for viewing lectures. However, students find accelerated, video-recorded lectures equally or more valuable. Although educators may be uncomfortable with the fundamental change in the learning process represented by video-recorded lecture use, students’ responses indicate that their decisions to attend lectures or view recorded lectures are motivated primarily by a desire to satisfy their professional goals. A challenge remains for educators to incorporate technologies students find useful while creating an interactive learning culture.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Student Decisions about Lecture Attendance: Do Electronic Course Materials Matter?Academic Medicine, 2007
- Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trialBMC Medical Education, 2007
- Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teachingMedical Education, 2007
- Medical Student Attendance at Non-compulsory LecturesAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2006
- The attitudes of undergraduate students and staff to the use of electronic learningBritish Dental Journal, 2004
- Medical Student Evaluations of Lectures Attended in Person or From Rural Sites via Interactive VideoconferencingTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2004
- A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture.Medical Education, 2001
- Students' evaluation of online course materials in Fixed Prosthodontics: a case studyEuropean Journal of Dental Education, 2001
- The SPECIAL SystemJournal of Research on Computing in Education, 2000
- Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996