Defaulters in general practice: reasons for default and patterns of attendance.
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- Vol. 40 (331), 50-2
Abstract
A series of 40 patients in general practice who failed to attend for their appointments were studied to look at their patterns of attendance over the previous five years, together with their reasons for default. The group not only defaulted more often than a group of age and sex matched controls but made significantly more visits to the surgery. Seventeen of the patients increased their default rate as their attendance rate increased over the five year period. The main reasons patients gave for defaulting on the occasion studied were: feeling too ill to attend (eight patients), resolution of symptoms (six) or forgotten/confused appointment time (seven). Four patients were thought by the general practitioner to need a home visit, two of whom were suffering from depression. Further research is needed to define those who would be expected to need a visit.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-attendance or non-invitation? A case-control study of failed outpatient appointments.BMJ, 1989
- New-patient no-shows in an urban family practice center: analysis and intervention.1986
- What happens to defaulters from a diabetic clinic?BMJ, 1985
- Telephone prompting to increase attendance at a Psychiatric Outpatient ClinicAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1983
- Waning Effectiveness of Mailed Reminders on Reducing Broken AppointmentsPediatrics, 1981
- Appointment-keeping behavior in adolescentsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1981
- Dropouts and Broken AppointmentsMedical Care, 1980
- Characteristics of Defaulters in Treatment for Infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeaeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1979
- Failed appointments: a review.1979