A Comment on “The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Critical Examination”
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 7 (1), 11-13
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00659.x
Abstract
Wood, Nczworski, and Stejskal are correct in noting that the Comprehensive System has been scrutinized less carefully than might have been expected or desired A few critiques have addressed isolated variables in the system, and some comments that have been published suggest that attempts at detailed scoring-coding of the Rorschach tend to neglect the idiographic features of the subject and that the system itself has limited use because it is not aligned with any particular theory of personality This article by Wood et al evolves from a different perspective in which the authors attempt to evaluate the system from an empirical basis Unfortunately, I am not sure that they have achieved their objective, mainly because the manner in which they have addressed each of the issues selected for discussion presents a rather misleading picture Let me attempt to address each in this commentKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Narcissism in the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1995
- Comment on “Narcissism in the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach”.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1995
- The Impact of Response Frequency on the Rorschach Constellation Indices and on Their Validity With Diagnostic and MMPI-2 CriteriaJournal of Personality Assessment, 1993
- "A conceptual critique of the EA:es comparison in the Comprehensive Rorschach System": Comment.Psychological Assessment, 1992
- Rorschach Depression Indices With Children and Adolescents: Concurrent Validity FindingsJournal of Personality Assessment, 1991
- Psychopathology reconsidered: Depressions interpreted as psychosocial transactionsClinical Psychology Review, 1989