Sequential single agents as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: a strategy derived from the results of GOG-132
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
- Vol. 13 (s2), 156-162
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2003.13351.x
Abstract
First-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer during the past decade has evolved toward the use of carboplatin and paclitaxel combinations. This has been based on randomized trials showing that combinations of these two drugs lead to a outcome similar to that obtained using cisplatin and paclitaxel (that had, in turn, proven superior in progression-free survival and overall survival to cisplatin and cyclophosphamide) but with less toxicity. Surprisingly, taxane-platinum combinations were not superior to control arms in two studies (ICON3 and GOG-132) utilizing carboplatin or cisplatin as the comparators. This has renewed interest in the role of single agents in first-line chemotherapy - a concept also supported by a number of prior clinical trials with single-agent platinum compounds yielding results not inferior to combinations. Early 'pre-emptive' crossover (prior to the stipulated clinical progression) to paclitaxel or a paclitaxel-containing regimen, however, occurred in 24% of patients initially treated with cisplatin on GOG-132. This has led to the interpretation of this trial as a combination versus sequential design. Although not subscribing to this interpretation, the results of GOG-132 and ICON3 not only raise doubts over a clear superiority of combinations over single agents but also lead to a consideration of sequential treatment designs for first line. Advantages of such designs are: (a) ability to provide 'dose-dense' platinums followed by 'dose-dense' paclitaxel and, perhaps, other drugs; and (b) the potential of acquiring biological data linked to the antitumor effects of a specific drug. Mathematical modeling and recent positive results in breast cancer adjuvant therapy support the use of 'dose-dense' strategies, and these should be considered in the design of future trials in ovarian cancer.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- First-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, platinum and the evidenceBritish Journal of Cancer, 2002
- Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Randomized Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin-Cyclophosphamide in Women With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Three-Year ResultsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Phase III Randomized Study of Cisplatin Versus Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Suboptimal Stage III or IV Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- First-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: paclitaxel, cisplatin and the evidenceBritish Journal of Cancer, 1998
- Randomized trial of dose-intensity with single-agent carboplatin in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. London Gynaecological Oncology Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Relationships between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1992
- Cis-platinum in the treatment of advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the ovaryAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1983
- High-dose platinum for the treatment of refractory ovarian cancerGynecologic Oncology, 1981