Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials
Open Access
- 12 February 2010
- Vol. 340 (feb12 1), c467
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c467
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the relative short term safety and intermediate term efficacy of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources BIOSIS, Embase, Medline, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts database, ISI Web of Science, and Google scholar and bibliographies, from 1 January 1990 to 25 July 2009. Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis with or without symptoms. Data extraction Primary end point was a composite of mortality or stroke. Secondary end points were death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or facial neuropathy (as individual end points), and mortality or disabling stroke (as a composite end point). Data synthesis 11 trials were included (4796 patients); 10 reported on short term outcomes (n=4709) and nine on intermediate term outcomes (1-4 years). The periprocedural risk of mortality or stroke was lower for carotid endarterectomy (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.95; P=0.025) than for carotid stenting, mainly because of a decreased risk of stroke (0.65, 0.43 to 1.00; P=0.049), whereas the risk of death (1.14, 0.56 to 2.31; P=0.727) and the composite end point mortality or disabling stroke (0.74, 0.53 to 1.05; P=0.088) did not differ significantly. The odds of periprocedural myocardial infarction (2.69, 1.06 to 6.79; P=0.036) or cranial nerve injury (10.2, 4.0 to 26.1; PConclusions Carotid endarterectomy was found to be superior to carotid artery stenting for short term outcomes but the difference was not significant for intermediate term outcomes; this difference was mainly driven by non-disabling stroke. Significantly fewer cranial nerve injuries and myocardial infarctions occurred with carotid artery stenting.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thirty-Day Outcomes for Carotid Artery Stenting in 6320 Patients From 2 Prospective, Multicenter, High-Surgical-Risk RegistriesCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2009
- Sodium bicarbonate-based hydration prevents contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysisBMC Medicine, 2009
- Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endarterectomy and Endovascular Treatment for Carotid Artery StenosisStroke, 2009
- Atorvastatin Reduces the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Carotid AtherosclerosisStroke, 2008
- Safety of carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid artery disease: a meta-analysisEuropean Heart Journal, 2007
- Arcsine test for publication bias in meta‐analyses with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Recent developments in meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Risk of persistent cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomyJournal of Neurosurgery, 2004