Health Decision Aids To Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Office Practice
- 15 January 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 136 (2), 127-135
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00010
Abstract
For medical decisions with more than one reasonable option, patient participation in decision making is often necessary to optimally match management decisions with patient preferences. Health decision aids are designed to facilitate shared decision making by helping patients and their physicians choose among reasonable clinical options. Although these aids vary in content, common denominators are the presentation of more than one reasonable strategy for a clinical management question and a description of the possible outcomes of the various options. Although the number of published randomized trials assessing the impact of health decision aids on the quality of medical decisions is limited (but growing), various types of decision aids do generally appear to inform patients about their treatment options better than “usual care” can. Little evidence is available to determine whether one type of decision aid is optimal, but more complicated programs seem to have larger effects. The cost-effectiveness of decision aids has not been studied, although it is enticing to think that the pattern of more conservative decisions by users of some decision aids could reduce medical care costs in a manner that is dictated by patient preferences.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the Quality of Decision Making in Breast Cancer: Consultation Planning Template and Consultation Recording TemplateOncology Nursing Forum, 2003
- Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision AidsMedical Decision Making, 2000
- Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic reviewBMJ, 1999
- PSA screening – current controversy,Annals of Oncology, 1998
- Evaluating Interventions to Promote Patient Involvement in Decision-Making: By What Criteria Should Effectiveness be Judged?Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1998
- Whither Scientific Deliberation in Health Policy Recommendations? — Alice in the Wonderland of Breast-Cancer ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Breast Cancer Screening Among Women in Their Forties: An Overview of the IssuesJNCI Monographs, 1997
- Patient Reactions to a Program Designed to Facilitate Patient Participation in Treatment Decisions for Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaMedical Care, 1995
- Validation of a Decisional Conflict ScaleMedical Decision Making, 1995
- Indications for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The American Urological Association StudyCancer, 1992