Refractive evaluation of astigmatic keratotomy procedures
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 15 (1), 25-31
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(89)80136-1
Abstract
We evaluated the efficacy of three transverse incision astigmatic keratotomy procedures using a vector analysis that enabled us to determine the magnitude of the effect and the axis in which it occurred. These procedures were used for low levels of astigmatism (0.5 diopter [D] to 3.75 D): (1) staggered, radial-touching transverse (T) incisions, (2) non-radial-touching T incisions, and (3) T incisions with interrupted radial. Most procedures were performed in conjunction with radial keratotomy for spherical correction of myopia. The non-radial-touching T procedure was the least effective method of reducing astigmatism. The staggered, radial-touching T and T with interrupted radial procedures were equally effective in reducing over 93% (on the average) of the preoperative astigmatism. Of these two procedures, the T with interrupted radial procedure was the most accurate, with the effect of the surgery deviating less than ten degrees from the desired axis in over 70% of the eves.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Graded nonintersecting transverse incisions for correction of idiopathic astigmatismJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1987
- Dynamic Shifts in Corneal Topography During the Modified Ruiz Procedure for AstigmatismArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1986
- Quantifiable astigmatism correction: Concepts and suggestions, 1986Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1986
- Trapezoidal KeratotomyOphthalmology, 1986
- The Effect of Different Radial Keratotomy Patterns on Astigmatism in RabbitsJournal of Refractive Surgery, 1985
- Trapezoidal Astigmatic Keratotomy in Human Cadaver EyesJournal of Refractive Surgery, 1985
- Keratotomy Procedures for the Correction of AstigmatismJournal of Refractive Surgery, 1985
- Astigmatic difference in refractive errors.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1968