Neurostimulation in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Trial
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 104 (5), 1275-1280
- https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000226101.63736.20
Abstract
Ultrasound guidance (USG) for infraclavicular blocks provides real time visualization of the advancing needle and local anesthetic distribution. Whether visualization of local anesthetic spread can supplant neurostimulation as the end point for local anesthetic injection during USG block has never been formally evaluated. Therefore, for this prospective randomized study, we recruited 72 patients scheduled for hand or forearm surgery and compared the speed of execution and quality of USG infraclavicular block with either USG alone (Group U) or USG combined with neurostimulation (Group S). In Group U, local anesthetic was deposited in a U-shaped distribution posterior and to each side of the axillary artery using as few injections as possible (1, 2, and 3 injections in 29, 6, and 3 patients, respectively). In Group S, a single injection was made after obtaining a distal motor response with a stimulating current between 0.3 and 0.6 mA. The anesthetic solution consisted of 0.5 mL/kg of lidocaine 1.5%, bupivacaine 0.125%, and epinephrine 1:200 000 (final concentrations). Procedure times were significantly shorter in Group U compared with Group S (3.1 +/- 1.6 min and 5.2 +/- 4.7 min, respectively; P = 0.006). In Group S, anesthetic spread was mainly anterior to the axillary artery in 37% of patients and mainly posterior in 63% of patients. Thirty minutes after the injection, 86% of patients in Group U had complete sensory block in the musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerve territories compared with 57% in Group S (P = 0.007). Patients blocked in Group U with a single injection had the same rate of complete block (86%) as those blocked with more than one injection (86%). Block supplementation rates were 8% in Group U versus 26% in Group S (P = 0.049). Block failure occurred in one patient in Group S because of an inability to obtain a distal stimulation after 20 min. We conclude that USG infraclavicular block is more rapidly performed and yields a higher success rate when visualization of local anesthetic spread is used as the end point for injection. Posterolateral spread of local anesthetic around the axillary artery predicts successful block, circumventing the need for direct nerve visualization.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Versus Supraclavicular BlockAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2005
- Reply to Dr. Sala-BlanchRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2004
- A Comparison of Single Versus Multiple Injections on the Extent of Anesthesia with Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus BlockAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2004
- Increased success rate with infraclavicular brachial plexus block using a dual-injection techniqueJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2004
- Ultrasound guidance for infraclavicular brachial plexus anaesthesia in childrenAnaesthesia, 2004
- Ultrasound Guidance Speeds Execution and Improves the Quality of Supraclavicular BlockAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2003
- Brachial Plexus Examination and Localization Using Ultrasound and Electrical StimulationAnesthesiology, 2003
- The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: an observational study of 150 patientsCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2003
- A Comparison of a Single-Stimulation Lateral Infraclavicular Plexus Block With a Triple-stimulation Axillary BlockRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2003
- Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Practice of Brachial Plexus AnesthesiaRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2001