STEADY‐STATE PERFORMANCE ON FIXED‐, MIXED‐, AND RANDOM‐RATIO SCHEDULES

Abstract

Three groups of rats pressed a lever for milk reinforcers on various simple reinforcement schedules (one schedule per condition). In Group M, each pair of conditions included a mixed‐ratio schedule and a fixed‐ratio schedule with equal average response:reinforcer ratios. On mixed‐ratio schedules, reinforcement occurred with equal probability after a small or a large response requirement was met. In Group R, fixed‐ratio and random‐ratio schedules were compared in each pair of conditions. For all subjects in these two groups, the frequency distributions of interresponse times of less than one second were very similar on all ratio schedules, exhibiting a peak at about .2 seconds. For comparison, subjects in Group V responded on variable‐interval schedules, and few interresponse times as short as .2 seconds were recorded. The results suggest that the rate of continuous responding is the same on all ratio schedules, and what varies among ratio schedules is the frequency, location, and duration of pauses. Preratio pauses were longer on fixed‐ratio schedules than on mixed‐ratio or random‐ratio schedules, but there was more within‐ratio pausing on mixed‐ratio and random‐ratio schedules. Across a single trial, the probability of an interruption in responding decreased on fixed‐ratio schedules, was roughly constant on random‐ratio schedules, and often increased and then decreased on mixed‐ratio schedules. These response patterns provided partial support for Mazur's (1982) theory that the probability of instrumental responding is directly related to the probability of reinforcement and the proximity of reinforcement.