Clinical–Diffusion Mismatch and Benefit From Thrombolysis 3 to 6 Hours After Acute Stroke
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 40 (7), 2572-2574
- https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.109.548073
Abstract
Background and Purpose— The clinical-diffusion mismatch (CDM) model has been proposed as a simpler tool than perfusion-diffusion mismatch (PDM) to select acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy. We hypothesized that in the 3- to 6-hour time window, the effect of tPA was significantly greater in patients with CDM than in patients without CDM. Methods— This is a substudy of EPITHET, a double-blind multi-center study of 100 patients randomized to tPA or placebo 3 to 6 hours after stroke onset. MRI was obtained before treatment, and at 3 to 5 days and 90 days after treatment. Presence of PDM (perfusion deficit/DWIvolume >1.2 and perfusion deficit at least 10 mL>DWIvolume) and CDM (NIHSS ≥8 and DWIvolume ≤25 mL) was determined for each patient. We assessed lesion growth and neurological improvement (decrease in NIHSS ≥8 points between baseline and 90 days, or a 90-day NIHSS ≤1). Results— 86% of the patients had PDM, but only 41% had CDM. CDM detected PDM with a sensitivity of 46% and a specific...Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trialThe Lancet Neurology, 2008
- Evaluation of the Clinical–Diffusion and Perfusion–Diffusion Mismatch Models in DEFUSEStroke, 2007
- Clinical-diffusion mismatch defined by NIHSS and ASPECTS in non-lacunar anterior circulation infarctionZeitschrift für Neurologie, 2007
- Clinical-Diffusion Mismatch Predicts the Putative Penumbra With High SpecificityStroke, 2005
- The clinical–DWI mismatchNeurology, 2004