On the Reliability of Testlet‐Based Tests
- 12 September 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Educational Measurement
- Vol. 28 (3), 237-247
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00356.x
Abstract
If a test is constructed of testlets, one must take into account the within‐testlet structure in the calculation of test statistics. Failing to do so may yield serious biases in the estimation of such statistics as reliability. We demonstrate how to calculate the reliability of a testlet‐based test. We show that traditional reliabilities calculated on two reading comprehension tests constructed of four testlets are substantial overestimates.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Testlet Functioning: Definitions and DetectionJournal of Educational Measurement, 1991
- Understanding ReliabilityEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991
- On the sampling theory roundations of item response theory modelsPsychometrika, 1990
- Toward a Psychometrics for TestletsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1990
- Trace Lines for Testlets: A Use of Multiple‐Categorical‐Response ModelsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1989
- Item Clusters and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Case for TestletsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1987
- TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categoriesPsychometrika, 1972
- Note on the Reliability of a Test: A Reply to Dr. Crum's Criticism.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1924
- Note on the Use of Spearman's Prophecy Formula for Reliability.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1923