Ethnic Bias in Anthropometric Estimates of DXA Abdominal Fat
- 1 September 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 43 (9), 1785-1790
- https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318216d90f
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the race/ethnicity bias of using waist circumference (WC) to estimate abdominal fat. A total of 771 females and 484 males (17-35 yr) were tested one to three times during a prescribed 30-wk aerobic exercise program. The race/ethnicity distribution for women was non-Hispanic white, 29%; Hispanic, 25%; African American (AA), 35%; Asian Indian, 3%; and Asian, 8%. The distribution for men was non-Hispanic white, 37%; Hispanic, 26%; AA, 22%; Asian Indian, 5%; and Asian, 10%. Abdominal fat (L1-L5) was estimated from whole-body scanning using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA Abd-Fat). DXA Abd-Fat varied by race/ethnicity after accounting for WC and height in both women and men. The increase in DXA Abd-Fat per increase in WC was lower in the Asian and Asian-Indian women than that in the other women. The increase in DXA Abd-Fat per increase in WC was higher in the AA men and lower in the Asian-Indian men than that in the other men. These differential race/ethnicity effects were most notable when WC exceeded ≈90 cm in the women and ≈100 cm in the men, values which are consistent with current definitions of abdominal obesity in the United States. Prediction equations for abdominal fat using WC that do not account for race/ethnicity group provide biased estimates. These results may affect assessment of disease risk from abdominal obesity among racial/ethnic groups.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Waist Circumference, BMI, and Visceral Adipose Tissue in White Women and Women of African DescentObesity, 2011
- The Relationship of Waist Circumference and BMI to Visceral, Subcutaneous, and Total Body Fat: Sex and Race DifferencesObesity, 2011
- Exposing College Students to Exercise: The Training Interventions and Genetics of Exercise Response (TIGER) StudyJournal of American College Health, 2010
- Body mass index bias in defining obesity of diverse young adults: the Training Intervention and Genetics of Exercise Response (TIGER) StudyBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2009
- Cross-validation of generalised body composition equations with diverse young men and women: the Training Intervention and Genetics of Exercise Response (TIGER) StudyBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2008
- Visceral Fat, Waist Circumference, and BMI: Impact of Race/ethnicityObesity, 2008
- The Use of BMI and Waist Circumference as Surrogates of Body Fat Differs by EthnicityObesity, 2007
- Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999-2004JAMA, 2006
- The paradox of low body mass index and high body fat percentage among Chinese, Malays and Indians in SingaporeInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Body mass index and percent body fat: a meta analysis among different ethnic groupsInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998