Arsenate and Arsenite Removal by Zerovalent Iron: Kinetics, Redox Transformation, and Implications for in Situ Groundwater Remediation
Top Cited Papers
- 13 February 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 35 (7), 1487-1492
- https://doi.org/10.1021/es001607i
Abstract
Batch tests were performed utilizing four zerovalent iron (Fe0) filings (Fisher, Peerless, Master Builders, and Aldrich) to remove As(V) and As(III) from water. One gram of metal was reacted headspace-free at 23 °C for up to 5 days in the dark with 41.5 mL of 2 mg L-1 As(V), or As(III) or As(V) + As(III) (1:1) in 0.01 M NaCl. Arsenic removal on a mass basis followed the order: Fisher > Peerless ≈ Master Builders > Aldrich; whereas, on a surface area basis the order became: Fisher > Aldrich > Peerless ≈ Master Builders. Arsenic concentration decreased exponentially with time, and was below 0.01 mg L-1 in 4 days with the exception of Aldrich Fe0. More As(III) was sorbed than As(V) by Peerless Fe0 in the initial As concentration range between 2 and 100 mg L-1. No As(III) was detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on Peerless Fe0 at 5 days when As(V) was the initial arsenic species in the solution. As(III) was detected by XPS at 30 and 60 days present on Peerless Fe0, when As(V) was the initial arsenic species in the solution. Likewise, As(V) was found on Peerless Fe0 when As(III) was added to the solution. A steady distribution of As(V) (73−76%) and As(III) (22−25%) was achieved at 30 and 60 days on the Peerless Fe0 when either As(V) or As(III) was the initial added species. The presence of both reducing species (Fe0 and Fe2+) and an oxidizing species (MnO2) in Peerless Fe0 is probably responsible for the coexistence of both As(V) and As(III) on Fe0 surfaces. The desorption of As(V) and As(III) by phosphate extraction decreased as the residence time of interaction between the sorbents and arsenic increased from 1 to 60 days. The results suggest that both As(V) and As(III) formed stronger surface complexes or migrated further inside the interior of the sorbent with increasing time.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The mechanism of anion adsorption on iron oxides: Evidence for the bonding of arsenate tetrahedra on free Fe(O, OH)6 edgesGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1995
- Coupled Iron Corrosion and Chromate Reduction: Mechanisms for Subsurface RemediationEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1995
- Reactions at Oxide Surfaces. 1. Oxidation of As(III) by Synthetic BirnessiteEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1995
- Evaluation of contaminant ion adsorption/desorption on goethite using pressure jump relaxation kineticsGeoderma, 1995
- Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: Part 2. Kinetics of arsenate adsorption and coprecipitationGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1993
- Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: Part 1. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenateGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1993
- A review of arsenic (III) in groundwaterCritical Reviews in Environmental Control, 1991
- Arsenic speciation in the environmentChemical Reviews, 1989
- Anion Interactions with Freshly Prepared Hydrous Iron OxidesClays and Clay Minerals, 1982
- Adsorption of arsenite on amorphous iron hydroxide from dilute aqueous solutionEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1980