Refractoriness in Information Processing
- 1 February 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 20 (1), 38-50
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746808400126
Abstract
Two experiments on refractoriness were carried out in which the warning, first and second signals, S0, S1 and S2 respectively, were all single-valued, and the distributions of random intervals between S0 and S1, and S1 and S 2 were the same. In the first experiment the intervals in a trial were statistically independent: the null hypothesis, that the latencies of the two responses would be similar, was rejected, but the results were also found to agree with no existing alternative hypothesis. In the second experiment the intervals in a trial were conditionally related and the second response was found to be faster than in the first experiment. This is discussed in the context of the issue of serial or parallel processing of information.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Payoff: A Neglected Factor in Reaction Time MeasurementQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966
- Central Intermittency Twenty Years LaterQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966
- Development of readiness to respond during short foreperiods.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966
- Response Time to the Second of Two Successive Signals as a Function of Absolute and Relative Duration of Intersignal IntervalPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1965
- Reaction time to single and to first signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- Costs and payoffs are instructions.Psychological Review, 1961
- Sequential Redundancy and Speed in a Serial Two-Choice Responding TaskQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961
- Perception and communication.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958
- The Limits of the “Psychological Refractory Period”The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956
- Perceptual Anticipation and Reaction TimeThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950