The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments
- 25 September 1975
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 293 (13), 642-646
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197509252931307
Abstract
(First of Two Parts)SKILLED physicians examining a patient may disagree regarding the findings. Such disagreements reflect the imperfect reliability of clinical methods and data. A decade ago, Fletcher1 urged physicians to abandon unreliable methods and stop teaching unreliable signs to their students. This paper reviews studies of physician reliability published in the last decade, together with a few studies not discussed in earlier reviews.1 2 3 4 Today, consumers, insurers and government agencies, as well as physicians and their students, must become aware of the imperfect reliability of the methods and data of clinical medicine. Public Law 92–603, the Professional Standards Review . . .This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Re-analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric DiagnosisThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1974
- Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Reliability of Physical Signs in Patients with Severe Attacks of Ulcerative ColitisBMJ, 1971
- Observer Variation in the Clinical and Radiological Assessment of HepatosplenomegalyBMJ, 1970
- Repeatability of physical signs in airways obstructionThorax, 1969
- Observer variability in recording the peripheral pulses.Heart, 1968
- THE OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSUREActa Medica Scandinavica, 1968
- Correlation of Clinical Signs with Ventilatory Function in Obstructive Lung DiseaseAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1965
- Variation Between Observers in Describing Mucosal Appearances in ProctocolitisBMJ, 1964
- ARTERIAL PRESSURE IN AN INDUSTRIAL POPULATION: AND ITS BEARING ON THE PROBLEM OF ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSIONThe Lancet, 1962