An Analysis of Overshadowing and Blocking
Open Access
- 1 February 1971
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 23 (1), 118-125
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557143000121
Abstract
In classical aversive conditioning experiments, rats do not always learn about all aspects of a compound stimulus predicting shock. A strong stimulus may overshadow a weaker one; and pretraining on one component may block learning about a second component. These results have been explained either by appealing to a notion of selective attention, or by assuming that learning about one component is a function of prior response strength to the entire compound of which it forms a part. In Experiment I, overshadowing was demonstrated on the first trial of conditioning, i.e. before either component had acquired any response strength. In Experiment II, pretraining on one component resulted in complete failure to learn about a second component during compound training, but did not prevent additional learning about the first component. Both results were interpreted as supporting an attentional analysis of blocking and overshadowing.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blocking and enhancement of stimulus control in pigeons.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970
- Determiners of selective stimulus control in the pigeon.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970
- A demonstration of overshadowing in operant conditioningPsychonomic Science, 1969
- Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- Suppression of learning about a hard cue by the presence of an easy cuePsychonomic Science, 1967
- Learning with one and two cuesPsychonomic Science, 1967
- Interaction of reward magnitude and conditioned fear on the consummatory responsePsychonomic Science, 1966
- Incidental Cue Learning in RatsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965