FURTHER EXPERIENCE WITH THE DOUBLE ONLAY PREPUTIAL FLAP FOR HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 164, 998-1001
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200009020-00020
Abstract
Severe hypospadias can be safely and reliably repaired in 1 stage using island flaps of preputial skin. However, problems with conventional techniques include penile asymmetry resulting from rotation of the vascular pedicle around 1 side of the penile shaft and at times doubtful viability of the Byars flaps used for ventral skin coverage. We describe how some of these problems can be resolved using the double onlay preputial flap for hypospadias repair. We reviewed the records of 47 children who underwent 1-stage double onlay preputial flap hypospadias repair at our institution between June 1994 and July 1998. Patient age ranged from 6 months to 9 years (mean 12.2 months). The urethral meatus was at the midshaft in 12 patients (25%), penoscrotal in 30 (64%) and perineal in 5 (11%). Chordee repair required dorsal plication in 29 patients, 7 of whom required an additional ventral incision of the tunica albuginea and tunica vaginalis autograft with preservation of the urethral plate to complete the repair. Scrotal transposition and bifid scrotum were repaired at the time of hypospadias repair in 9 patients. Followup was 3 to 47 months (mean 15.2 months). Complications requiring reoperation occurred in 12 patients (25%). In 8 (17%) boys a fistula developed, of whom 6 had perineal and 2 had penoscrotal hypospadias. Fistula closure was required in all patients. Successful closure was achieved with 1 procedure in 6 patients, required an additional fistula repair in 1 and remains to be determined in 1. Diverticula, meatal recession and persistent penile curvature requiring repeat dorsal plication occurred in 4 (9%), 2 (4%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. Revision for a bulky ventral skin strip was required in 1 boy (2%). All complications occurred in patients with the more proximal hypospadias. The double onlay preputial flap technique for hypospadias repair offers good cosmetic and functional results. Given the high incidence of penoscrotal and perineal hypospadias (75%) in our series complication rates are comparable or better than those of other techniques.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hypospadias repair by skin flaps: a comparison of onlay preputial island flaps with either Mathieu’s meatal-based or Duckett’s tubularized preputial flapsBJU International, 2001
- Comparison of Onlay and Tubularized Island Flaps of Inner Preputial Skin for the Repair of Proximal HypospadiasJournal of Urology, 1997
- Hypospadias: The Release of Chordee Without Dividing the Urethral Plate and Onlay Island Flap (92 Cases)Journal of Urology, 1994
- Two-Stage Repair for Severe HypospadiasJournal of Urology, 1994
- Changing Concepts of Hypospadias Curvature Lead to More Onlay Island Flap ProceduresJournal of Urology, 1994
- Transverse mucosal preputial flap for repair of severe hypospadias and isolated chordee without hypospadias: A 350-case experienceJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1993
- Onlay Island Flap Urethroplasty: Variation on a ThemeJournal of Urology, 1992
- One-Stage Preputial Pedicle Flap Repair for Hypospadias: Experience with 100 PatientsPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Onlay Island Flap in the Repair of Mid and Distal Penile Hypospadias Without ChordeeJournal of Urology, 1987
- A One-stage Hypospadias RepairJournal of Urology, 1970