Is the biomechanical principle of ‘antagonistic compensation’ valid also on the genetic level?
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Cells Tissues Organs
- Vol. 97 (2), 175-179
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000144731
Abstract
According to ‘antagonistic compensation’, appendicular bones rendered hypofunctional by surgical means, become shorter and more robust. In normal Buffalo rats, appendicular bones are short and very robust and in Fisher rats they are long and gracile. Total body constitution is robust in Buffalo rats and gracile in Fisher rats. In GRL rats, appendicular bones are short but body constitution is gracile and the robusticity of the appendicular bones is intermediate between Fisher and Buffalo rats. Thus, total body constitution and relative length of the appendicular bones determine their robusticity, shorter bones being more robust than longer bones. In other words, the relationship between bone length and robusticity is the same in experimentally produced antagonistic compensation and genetically determined normal condition of rats.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constitution and body proportions in different strains of ratsCells Tissues Organs, 1976
- The effects of experimental bipedalism and upright posture in the rat and their significance for the study of human evolutionCells Tissues Organs, 1966
- The density of selected bones of the human skeletonAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1958