Choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivity suggests that ganglion cells in the goldfish retina are not cholinergic

Abstract

Published evidence that ganglion cells in the retinae of nonmammalian species are cholinergic is strong but indirect. In this paper we report results of attempts to demonstrate choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivity in ganglion cells of goldfish retina using two different antisera against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), the acetylcholine‐synthesizing enzyme. We obtained ChAT‐immunoreactive staining of amacrine and displaced amacrine cells in the retina and type XIV cells in the tectum, but we obtained no direct immunocytochemical evidence that ganglion cells in the goldfish retina are cholinergic. Thus, ganglion cells identified by retrograde transport of propidium iodide were never ChAT‐immunoreactive. Intraocular injections of colchicine did not result in the appearance of a population of ChAT‐immunoreactive neurons in the ganglion cell layer. ChAT‐immunoreactive axons were not observed in intact, ligated, or transected optic nerves. And finally, the ChAT immunoreactivity of cells and fibers in the optic tectum was unaffected by deafferentation. These experiments provide no positive evidence that any ganglion cells in goldfish retina contain the acetylcholine‐synthesizing enzyme, ChAT. While it is possible that our method is too insensitive to detect the enzyme in ganglion cell somata or too specific to recognize the form of ChAT present in these cells, the fact that we can stain putatively cholinergic retinal amacrine cells and tectal neurons makes these alternative explanations improbable. We conclude that it is unlikely that any of the ganglion cells in the retina are cholinergic and that alternative explanations should be sought for previously published results that suggest that they are.