Obstetric and neonatal outcome of babies weighing more than 4.5 kg: an analysis by parity
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 92 (2), 229-233
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00280-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why are babies getting heavier? Comparison of Scottish births from 1980 to 1992BMJ, 1997
- Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized studyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1997
- Data on episiotomy rates need analysis by parityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Is Macrosomia Predictable, and Are Shoulder Dystocia and Birth Trauma Preventable?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweightBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- The Green Bay cesarean section study IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetusAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Fetal macrosomia: Does antenatal prediction affect delivery route and birth outcome?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experienceObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- The Dangers of Fetal MacrosomiaJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991