Observed Differences in Diagnostic Test Accuracy between Patient Subgroups: Is It Real or Due to Reference Standard Misclassification?
Open Access
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 53 (10), 1725-1729
- https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.087403
Abstract
Before a new test is introduced in clinical practice, its accuracy should be assessed. In the past decade, researchers have put an increased emphasis on exploring differences in test sensitivity and specificity between patient subgroups. If the reference standard is imperfect and the prevalence of the target condition differs among subgroups, apparent differences in test sensitivity and specificity between subgroups may be caused by reference standard misclassification. We provide guidance on how to determine whether observed differences may be explained by reference standard misclassification. Such misclassification may be ascertained by examining how the apparent sensitivity and specificity change with the prevalence of the target condition in the subgroups.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (402764)
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combination of a Normal D-Dimer Concentration and a Non-High Pretest Clinical Probability Score Is a Safe Strategy to Exclude Deep Venous ThrombosisCirculation, 2003
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiativeBMJ, 2003
- The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and ElaborationClinical Chemistry, 2003
- The Clinical Usefulness of D-Dimer Testing in Cancer Patients With Suspected Deep Venous ThrombosisArchives of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferableBMJ, 2002
- Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Evaluation of diagnostic proceduresBMJ, 2002
- Evaluating Bias and Variability in Diagnostic Test ReportsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Spectrum Bias in the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests: Lessons from the Rapid Dipstick Test for Urinary Tract InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Evaluating Diagnostic Tests with Imperfect StandardsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1990
- Carcinoembryonic AntigenAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986