Predicting Resistance or Response to Chemotherapy by Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Neuroblastoma
Open Access
- 5 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 96 (19), 1457-1466
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh273
Abstract
Background: We previously showed that proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) enables estimation of neuroblastoma tumor viability. Here we investigated if 1H-MRS can predict response or resistance to chemotherapy in neuroblastoma. Methods: Neuroblastoma cell lines with various drug sensitivities were treated with cytotoxic drugs (cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan) and examined by 1H-MRS. Viability was assessed by trypan blue staining and the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay. Nude rats carrying drug-sensitive or drug-resistant neuroblastoma xenografts were treated for 4 days with irinotecan (n = 11) or saline (n = 11) and were examined with 1H-MRS at 4.7 T before and during treatment. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was used to test statistical significance of difference within treatment groups. Independent groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlation was assessed with Spearman’s rank correlation. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Cytotoxic drug treatment of drug-sensitive SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells resulted in increased methylene and polyunsaturated fatty acid resonances and decreased choline resonance. The methylene/choline ratio correlated with cell death (rs = .94, P<.001) and was increased in cisplatin-treated drug-sensitive (SH-SY5Y, IMR-32) but not drug-resistant [SK-N-BE(2), SK-N-FI, SK-N-AS] cell lines. No changes were observed in SK-N-BE(2) cells treated with irinotecan or cisplatin, whereas circumvention of the resistance by arsenic trioxide treatment led to lipid accumulation and choline depletion. Irinotecan therapy of rats carrying drug-sensitive xenografts caused the methylene/choline ratio of tumors to increase eightfold after 3 days (95% confidence interval [CI] = fivefold to 12-fold; P = .005 compared with pretreatment spectra at day 0) and caused tumors to regress statistically significantly on day 10 compared with pretreatment volume on day 0 (difference = –60%, 95% CI = –12% to -100%, n = 6; P = .012). The methylene/choline ratio of nonregressing drug-resistant xenografts was unaffected. No differences were observed after saline treatment. Conclusions: Response or resistance to chemotherapy is accurately predicted by 1H-MRS in experimental neuroblastoma models in vivo.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigmaNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- Noninvasive estimation of tumour viability in a xenograft model of human neuroblastoma with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS)British Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Staging of Neuroblastoma at Imaging: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology GroupRadiology, 2002
- N-myc Modulates Expression of p73 in NeuroblastomaNeoplasia, 2002
- p53 Cellular Localization and Function in NeuroblastomaThe American Journal of Pathology, 2001
- Detection of drug-induced apoptosis and necrosis in human cervical carcinoma cells using 1H NMR spectroscopyCell Death & Differentiation, 2001
- Serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging of glioblastoma multiforme after brachytherapyJournal of Neurosurgery, 1997
- Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with glial tumors: a multicenter studyJournal of Neurosurgery, 1996
- 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Investigation of Human Neuroblastoma in SituNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assaysJournal of Immunological Methods, 1983