A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING NONSTENTED VERSUS STENTED URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 165 (5), 1419-1422
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66320-3
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of upper urinary tract calculi with ureteroscopic techniquesUrology, 1999
- IS STENTING FOLLOWING URETEROSCOPY FOR REMOVAL OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI NECESSARY?Journal of Urology, 1999
- Ureteroscopy: Current Practice and Long-Term ComplicationsJournal of Urology, 1997
- Ureteroscopy without Routine Balloon Dilation: An Outcome AssessmentJournal of Urology, 1992
- Polyurethane Internal Ureteral Stents in Treatment of Stone Patients: Morbidity Related to Indwelling TimesJournal of Urology, 1991
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal calculi: The role of ureteral stents. A Randomized TrialJournal of Urology, 1991
- Comparison of Patient Acceptance of Polyurethane vs. Silicone Indwelling Ureteral StentsJournal of Endourology, 1990
- Morbidity Associated with Indwelling Internal Ureteral Stents after Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1989
- Symptoms Arising from Double-J Ureteral StentsJournal of Urology, 1988
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976