The ecological validity of tests of executive function
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Vol. 4 (6), 547-558
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617798466037
Abstract
Ninety-two mixed etiology neurological patients and 216 control participants were assessed on a range of neuropsychological tests, including 10 neuropsychological measures of executive function derived from 6 different tests. People who knew the patients well (relatives or carers) completed a questionnaire about the patient's dysexecutive problems in everyday life, and this paper reports the extent to which the tests predicted the patients' everyday life problems. All of the tests were significantly predictive of at least some of the behavioral and cognitive deficits reported by patients' carers. However, factor analysis of the patients' dysexecutive symptoms suggested a fractionation of the dysexecutive syndrome, with neuropsychological tests loading differentially on 3 underlying cognitive factors (Inhibition, Intentionality, and Executive Memory), supporting the conclusions that different tests measure different cognitive processes, and that there may be limits to the fractionation of the executive system. (JINS, 1998, 4, 547–558.)Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodology of frontal and executive functionZeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 1999
- Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesionsNeuropsychologia, 1995
- Route‐finding: A measure of everyday executive functioning in the head‐injured adultApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1993
- Posttraumatic anosmia and orbital frontal damage: Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric correlates.Neuropsychology, 1991
- Construct and Criterion-Related Validity of Planning, Simultaneous, and Successive Cognitive Processing TasksJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1987