Effect of Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block on Pain Relief, Quality of Life, and Survival in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 March 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 291 (9), 1092-1099
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.9.1092
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Effect of Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block on Pain Relief, Quality of Life, and Survival in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer — A Randomized Controlled Trial — ContextPancreatic cancer is an aggressive tumor associated with high mortality. Optimal pain control may improve quality of life (QOL) for these patients.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) vs opioids alone improves pain relief, QOL, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.Design, Setting, and PatientsDouble-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Enrolled (October 1997 and January 2001) were 100 eligible patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer experiencing pain. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year or until death.InterventionPatients were randomly assigned to receive either NCPB or systemic analgesic therapy alone with a sham injection. All patients could receive additional opioids managed by a clinician blinded to the treatment assignment.Main Outcome MeasuresPain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale), QOL, opioid consumption and related adverse effects, and survival time were assessed weekly by a blinded observer.ResultsMean (SD) baseline pain was 4.4 (1.7) for NCPB vs 4.1 (1.8) for opioids alone. The first week after randomization, pain intensity and QOL scores were improved (pain intensity, P≤.01 for both groups; QOL, P<.001 for both groups), with a larger decrease in pain for the NCPB group (P = .005). From repeated measures analysis, pain was also lower for NCPB over time (P = .01). However, opioid consumption (P = .93), frequency of opioid adverse effects (all P>.10), and QOL (P = .46) were not significantly different between groups. In the first 6 weeks, fewer NCPB patients reported moderate or severe pain (pain intensity rating of ≥5/10) vs opioid-only patients (14% vs 40%, P = .005). At 1 year, 16% of NCPB patients and 6% of opioid-only patients were alive. However, survival did not differ significantly between groups (P = .26, proportional hazards regression).ConclusionAlthough NCPB improves pain relief in patients with pancreatic cancer vs optimized systemic analgesic therapy alone, it does not affect QOL or survival.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scalePain, 2001
- Is the Placebo Powerless?New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Prospective randomized double-blind trial of neurolytic coeliac plexus block in patients with pancreatic cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Pain as a predictor of outcome in patients with operable pancreatic carcinomaSurgery, 1997
- Prospective Evaluation of Pain in Exocrine Pancreatic CancerDigestion, 1997
- Pharmacologic Treatment of Cancer PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Comparison between celiac plexus block and morphine treatment on quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer painPain, 1996
- When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with functionPain, 1995
- Morphine attenuates surgery-induced enhancement of metastatic colonization in ratsPain, 1993
- A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain reliefCancer, 1987