The polynomial-time hierarchy and sparse oracles
- 1 May 1986
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in Journal of the ACM
- Vol. 33 (3), 603-617
- https://doi.org/10.1145/5925.5937
Abstract
Questions about the polynomial-time hierarchy are studied. In particular, the questions, “Does the polynomial-time hierarchy collapse?” and “Is the union of the hierarchy equal to PSPACE?” are considered, along with others comparing the union of the hierarchy with certain probabilistic classes. In each case it is shown that the answer is “yes” if and only if for every sparse set S , the answer is “yes” when the classes are relativized to S if and only if there exists a sparse set S such that the answer is “yes” when the classes are relativized to S . Thus, in each case the question is answered if it is answered for any arbitrary sparse oracle set. Long and Selman first proved that the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses if and only if for every sparse set S , the hierarchy relative to S collapses. This result is re-proved here by a different technique.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relativizing complexity classes with sparse oraclesJournal of the ACM, 1986
- On bounded query machinesTheoretical Computer Science, 1985
- On small generatorsTheoretical Computer Science, 1984
- Some consequences of non-uniform conditions on uniform classesTheoretical Computer Science, 1983
- A note on sparse oracles for NPJournal of Computer and System Sciences, 1982
- Bounded query machines: On NP() and NPQUERY()Theoretical Computer Science, 1981
- On counting problems and the polynomial-time hierarchyTheoretical Computer Science, 1980
- The complexity of computing the permanentTheoretical Computer Science, 1979
- Complete sets and the polynomial-time hierarchyTheoretical Computer Science, 1976
- The polynomial-time hierarchyTheoretical Computer Science, 1976