Vesicovaginal and Ureterovaginal Fistulas: A Summary of 25 Years of Experience
- 1 March 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 123 (3), 370-374
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55941-8
Abstract
The difficult problem of a vesicovaginal fistula originally was cured surgically by Sims in 1849. During the last 25 years at UCLA and affiliated hospitals 68 patients have been treated by urologic surgeons for fistulas between the vagina and the urinary tract: 21 ureterovaginal and 47 vesicovaginal and urethrovaginal fistulas. The ureterovaginal fistulas often were complex and patients presented the most challenging diagnostic problem. However, they usually were repaired successfully by simple ureteroneocystostomy. Vesicovaginal and urethrovaginal fistulas were repaired transvaginally in 24 cases, with 70 per cent success at the first attempt and 92 per cent success with 2 attempts. Transabdominal or combined approaches were less successful. Only 58 per cent of the cases were closed at first attempt. The transvaginal approach required less operating time, and resulted in less blood loss and shorter hospital stays than the transabdominal approach and will be described in detail.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spontaneous Closure of Vesicouterine Fistula after Cesarean SectionJournal of Urology, 1978
- Transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistulasUrology, 1977
- The Use of the Omental Pedicle Graft in Urinary Tract ReconstructionJournal of Urology, 1976
- Management of Vesicovaginal Fistulas with Peritoneal Flap InterpositionJournal of Urology, 1974
- John Peter Mettauer of VirginiaJAMA, 1963
- Urinary FistulasPostgraduate Medicine, 1959
- Replacement of the Ureter by Small Intestine: Clinical Application and Results of the “ileal Ureter”Journal of Urology, 1959
- Use of the looped ureteral catheter in repair of vesicovaginal fistulaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1958
- On the Treatment of Vesico-Vaginal FistulaThe American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1852