Comparison of the information in arthroplasty registers from different countries
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Vol. 90 (3), 288-291
- https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b3.19556
Abstract
This article considers some of the problems of the interpretation of information from other national arthroplasty registers when setting up a new register. In order for the most useful information to be available from registers much international co-operation is required between all those responsible for the design of registers as well as those who gather, assess and publish the data.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knee arthroplasty registersThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty RegisterActa Orthopaedica, 2006
- Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register : 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003Acta Orthopaedica, 2005
- Langfristige Resultate mit dem zementfreien Alloclassic-Schaft nach ZweymüllerZeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete, 2001
- Survival analysis of cementless grit-blasted titanium total hip arthroplastiesThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplastiesActa Orthopaedica, 2000
- The Danish Hip Arthroplasty RegisterActa Orthopaedica, 2000
- Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 casesActa Orthopaedica, 2000
- The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty ProjectActa Orthopaedica, 2000
- The economic impact of failures in total hip replacement surgery:28,997 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987-1993Acta Orthopaedica, 1996