Molecular analysis of RANKL‐independent cell fusion of osteoclast‐like cells induced by TNF‐α, lipopolysaccharide, or peptidoglycan
- 14 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
- Vol. 101 (1), 122-134
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21167
Abstract
Focusing on the final step of osteoclastogenesis, we studied cell fusion from tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)‐positive mononuclear cells into multinuclear cells. TRAP‐positive mononuclear cells before generation of multinuclear cells by cell fusion were differentiated from RAW264.7 cells by treatment with receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), and then the cells were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), followed by culturing for further 12 h. LPS‐induced cell fusion even in the absence of RANKL. Similarly, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α and peptidoglycan (PGN) induced cell fusion, but M‐CSF did not. The cell fusion induced by RANKL, TNF‐α, and LPS was specifically blocked by osteoprotegerin (OPG), anti‐TNF‐α antibody, and polymyxin B, respectively. LPS‐ and PGN‐induced cell fusion was partly inhibited by anti‐TNF‐α antibody but not by OPG. When TRAP‐positive mononuclear cells fused to yield multinuclear cells, phosphorylation of Akt, Src, extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK), p38MAPK (p38), and c‐Jun NH2‐terminal kinase (JNK) was observed. The specific chemical inhibitors LY294002 (PI3K), PP2 (Src), U0126 (MAPK‐ERK kinase (MEK)/ERK), and SP600125 (JNK) effectively suppressed cell fusion, although SB203580 (p38) did not. mRNA of nuclear factor of activated T‐cells c1 (NFATc1) and dendritic cell‐specific transmembrane protein (DC‐STAMP) during the cell fusion was quantified, however, there was no obvious difference among the TRAP‐positive mononuclear cells treated with or without M‐CSF, RANKL, TNF‐α, LPS, or PGN. Collectively, RANKL, TNF‐α, LPS, and PGN induced cell fusion of osteoclasts through their own receptors. Subsequent activation of signaling pathways involving PI3K, Src, ERK, and JNK molecules was required for the cell fusion. Although DC‐STAMP is considered to be a requisite for cell fusion of osteoclasts, cell fusion‐inducing factors other than DC‐STAMP might be necessary for the cell fusion. J. Cell. Biochem. 101: 122–134, 2007.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biological implications of cell fusionNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2005
- Macrophage fusion: are somatic and cancer cells possible partners?Trends in Cell Biology, 2005
- The interleukin 1 receptor familyDevelopmental & Comparative Immunology, 2003
- Involvement of p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway in Osteoclastogenesis Mediated by Receptor Activator of NF-κB Ligand (RANKL)Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
- Receptor activator of NF‐κB recruits multiple TRAF family adaptors and activates c‐Jun N‐terminal kinaseFEBS Letters, 1999
- Involvement of calcium and arachidonate metabolism in acetylated‐low‐density‐lipoprotein‐stimulated tumor‐necrosis‐factor‐α production by rat peritoneal macrophagesEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1998
- Cloning and Initial Characterization of Mouse Meltrin β and Analysis of the Expression of Four MetalloproteaseDisintegrins in Bone CellsPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- Opposing Effects of ERK and JNK-p38 MAP Kinases on ApoptosisScience, 1995
- Osteoclasts express high levels of pp60c-src in association with intracellular membranes.The Journal of cell biology, 1992
- Appearance of osteoclasts by injections of lipopolysaccharides in rat periodontal tissueJournal of Periodontal Research, 1989