An Official ATS Statement: Grading the Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations in ATS Guidelines and Recommendations
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 174 (5), 605-614
- https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200602-197st
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of gastro-oesophageal reflux interventions for chronic cough associated with gastro-oesophageal refluxBMJ, 2005
- A New ATS Committee: Competing in the Marketplace of IdeasProceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2005
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Ventilation with lower tidal volumes versus traditional tidal volumes in adults for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndromePublished by Wiley ,2004
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Lung-Volume–Reduction Surgery with Medical Therapy for Severe EmphysemaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolismPublished by Wiley ,2000
- Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelinesBMJ, 1999
- Attributes of ATS Documents That Guide Clinical PracticeAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997