Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Immunology
- Vol. 8 (10), 788-801
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2416
Abstract
Developing CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) thymocytes differentiate either into CD4+ helper or CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, depending on the MHC-restriction specificity of their T-cell receptor (TCR). Classical models of CD4/CD8-lineage choice share the perspective that lineage choice occurs in thymocytes that express both Cd4 and Cd8 at the mRNA level (that is, transcriptionally Cd4+Cd8+) and results in the termination of transcription of one or the other co-receptor molecule as a consequence of the same TCR signals that mediate positive selection. Classical models are either stochastic or instructive, and experimental testing of these models has been extensive. However, crucial presumptions made by each classical model (stochastic selection, strength-of-signal or duration-of-signal models) have been experimentally contradicted. The kinetic signalling model of CD4/CD8-lineage choice differs in various respects from all classical models, as it postulates that TCR-signalled DP thymocytes first transiently terminate Cd8 gene expression and convert into Cd4+Cd8− intermediate cells in which CD4/CD8-lineage choices are then made. Thus, positive selection and lineage choice are sequential events. CD4/CD8-lineage choice is determined in Cd4+Cd8− intermediate cells by whether TCR-mediated positive selection signalling persists or ceases in the absence of Cd8 gene expression. Persistent TCR signalling drives CD4+ T-cell development, whereas disrupted TCR signalling permits signalling by interleukin-7 and other common cytokine-receptor γ-chain cytokines that drive CD8+ T-cell development. Recent advances in the molecular events that occur during CD4/CD8-lineage choice have identified a series of nuclear factors, including Th-POK (T-helper-inducing POZ/Kruppel-like factor), RUNX3 (runt-related transcription factor 3), TOX (thymus high-mobility group box protein) and GATA3 (GATA-binding protein 3), that are crucially involved in T-cell-lineage-fate determination. It is possible to integrate the activity of these nuclear factors into the kinetic signalling model to achieve an integrated picture of CD4/CD8-lineage choice on both a cellular and molecular level.Keywords
This publication has 121 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nucleoprotein structure of the CD4 locus: Implications for the mechanisms underlying CD4 regulation during T cell developmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- IL-7 promotes Glut1 trafficking and glucose uptake via STAT5-mediated activation of Akt to support T-cell survivalBlood, 2008
- Development of all CD4 T lineages requires nuclear factor TOXThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2008
- The role of the Runx transcription factors in thymocyte differentiation and in homeostasis of naive T cellsThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2007
- RANK signals from CD4+3− inducer cells regulate development of Aire-expressing epithelial cells in the thymic medullaThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2007
- Expression of the transcription factor cKrox in peripheral CD8 T cells reveals substantial postthymic plasticity in CD4-CD8 lineage differentiationThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2007
- Altered Development of CD8+ T Cell Lineages in Mice Deficient for the Tec Kinases Itk and RlkImmunity, 2006
- Commitment issues: linking positive selection signals and lineage diversification in the thymusImmunological Reviews, 2006
- How the T Cell Repertoire Becomes Peptide and MHC SpecificCell, 2005
- Regulation of T cell receptor expression in immature CD4+CD8+ thymocytes by p56lck tyrosine kinase: basis for differential signaling by CD4 and CD8 in immature thymocytes expressing both coreceptor molecules.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1993