Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip

Abstract

Regional bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) (head, arms, chest, spine, pelvis, legs) of a total body dual photon¹⁵³Gd absorptiometry (DPA) scan were measured in 20 healthy postmenopausal women, 27 postmenopausal women with hip fracture, and 17 postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis of the hip. In addition, local BMC and BMD were measured in the proximal and distal regions of the distal forearm (BMC_prox, BMD_prox, BMC_dis, BMD_dist) by single photon absorptiometry (SPA); and in the lumbar spine (BMC_L2-L4 and BMD_L2-L4) by¹⁵³Gd DPA. The overall impression was a reduction of bone mass in hip fracture patients compared with healthy controls and an increase in the bone mass of osteoarthritic patients. These results were valid using both regional values of the total body scan, and local forearm and lumbar spine measurements, and statistically significant using one-way analysis of variance. There were, however, also significant within-group between-region differences (one-way analysis of variance), showing that the bone mass of the pelvis and legs in hip fracture patients was more reduced than in the remaining skeleton; in osteoarthritic patients it was not increased but rather unchanged or slightly reduced. The differences between the level of the three local measurements (BMD_prox BMD_dist BMD_L2-L4), on the one hand, and the level of the six regional BMD values, on the other hand, were investigated by the two-way analysis of variance: local measurements = rows; regional values = columns. This analysis showed that none of the three local measurements was statistically better than the other two in predicting the overall level of skeletal bone mass as judged by the six regional values. We conclude that serious osteoporotic bone loss has a generalized nature, however, with a tendency towards lower values in the regions affected by fracture (viz: low bone mass in the legs of femoral neck fracture patients). Osteoarthritis may be associated with a high bone mass in most areas, but low values in the affected regions. Local lumbar spine measurement of bone mass by DPA is not superior to local forearm measurement of bone mass by SPA in predicting the nature of overall osteoporotic or osteoarthritic bone change.